Abstract:
This paper evaluates Sukuma ethnoichthyology within the
cognitive semantics theory’s envisioning of Sukuma fish
names. The motivation behind the investigation was geared
by the lack of study on the topic and the peculiarities found
in it. The Universal Grammar and cognitive semantics
theories were used in data evaluation and explanations. This
study employed a qualitative case study design, focusing on
Lake Victoria and Juma Island. Data was collected through
observation and unstructured interviews involving ten
Sukuma native fisheries selected purposively. The study
revealed that most of the Sukuma fish semantics structures
are not encyclopaedic, embodied experiences as claimed in
cognitive semantics, thus, they are bondless between signifier
and signified. This study recommends further research aimed
at coining theories that offer explanations for arbitrary
names. The study also underscores the need for the younger
generation to prioritise learning their local language names,
including those of fish, as a means of preserving their
linguistic heritage
